The case involving Denver-area baker Jack Phillips is the latest of three in Colorado pitting LGBTQ+ civil rights against First Amendment rights. The case originated when Phillips initially agreed to make a cake for attorney Autumn Scardina but then refused after Scardina explained she was going to use it to celebrate her gender transition. The Colorado Court of Appeals sided with Scardina, ruling that the pink-and-blue cake — on which Scardina did not request any writing — was not speech protected by the First Amendment. Do you believe that a business owner should have the right to refuse business if they don't like how the customer intends to use their product?

Phillips' attorney, Jake Warner, maintained the cakes Phillips creates are protected free speech. He told the justices that what Scardina told Phillips about the purpose of the cake mattered for his free-speech rights. Do you agree that creating cakes should be protected under free speech?

Should business owners have the right to refuse services based on their religious beliefs or personal convictions?